The North-South Rhetoric is a War against Hindu Dharma
| Mr Sandeep Balakrishna is a writer of Indian history, Hindu civilisation and culture for about two decades. He is a former Information Technology profess-ional with a successful career at major multinational corporations. He is the Founder and Editor of ‘The Dharma Dispatch’, an Online journal dedicated to Indian civilisation and culture. |
There has been a flurry of statements in public discourse recently about an alleged North Vs South India divide. When we peel off the layers, at the core, we find that it is nothing but a variant of the familiar anti-Hindu narrative.
Barely minutes after the contours of victory began to take shape in the recently concluded four-States’ Assembly polls, a sickening old narrative of divisiveness was revived. Its foremost revivalist, a political figure named Praveen Chakravarty, an alleged master strategist close to Rahul Gandhi, posted on X (formerly, Twitter) that the ‘South-North boundary line (is) getting thicker & clearer !’ The post has since been deleted following a tidal wave of backlash.
Praveen Chakravarty was the same person who had been the target of extensive fury in the Congress circles for leading Rahul Gandhi’s party to a handsome 55-seat tally in the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.
But now, others in the Congress and its extended family of Far Left Liberals faithfully picked up the alleged strategist’s narrative of North versus South India, making it seem as if they belong to two separate hemispheres. Its essence is straightforward : The Congress was decimated in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh because the voters out there are illiterate, uneducated, averse to eating meat, speak Hindi, and are … Hindu.
By the same logic, the Congress bagged Telangana because of the absence of these debilitations among its voters. But judged purely in the light of these electoral debacles, this narrative is akin to a coping mechanism for the Congress – consolation is any day preferable to mourning. However, common sense as well as a sense of history reveals that the present consolation is merely the political face of an old ideological coin that had won splendid victories for the Congress and had enabled it to retain its political dominance for more than half a century.
It’s quite remarkable that even after the fatal summer of 2014 when the Congress was bombed to near extinction on the national stage, it still managed to make impressive recoveries in various States from time to time. But it has also repeatedly lost even these States in the same duration. Its fate over the last decade resembles the embers underneath a charred ruin. Some sparks catch fire and feebly blaze awhile before reverting to their original state.
The current electoral humiliation must be viewed as such, and it has occurred due to an intrinsic weakness that has a considerable vintage. This intrinsic defect is precisely what makes Congress Governments stand just a step away from implosion. Anything from a minor rebellion or a wholesale defection or an electoral loss can cause it.
Perhaps the shrivelled veterans of the Congress have themselves forgotten the history of their own party. There used to be an era when there was no State in India that did not have a Congress Government. That terrifying power was also the Achilles’ Heel of its undoing.
Studying the archival material of that era is profoundly instructive. Even at the height of such absolute power, Congress diehards, wise observers and stoic commentators were unanimous about the aforementioned vulnerability – the Congress’ power was entirely sustained by a near total absence of an equal contender. And these contenders eventually emerged like trickles, first flowing out of its own ranks, and then from regional groupings before the BJP pullulated and shattered the Congress stranglehold.
In this historical light, the Congress had already lost all these States decades ago, and its recent losses are simply the continuation of that same trajectory. Its clones in the form of regional parties remain unbeatable by the Congress, proving the classic illustration of the parasite consuming its host.
The same historical light also shows that as it stands today, the BJP is the only truly national party in the sense of representing and standing for the sovereign unity and integrity of the Indian Republic.
By purveying a sinister and lethal brand of dynasty-centric politics for seven-plus decades, the Congress has reduced the ‘Indian’ and ‘National’ in its name to mere dead letters. Not stopping at that, it began, over the last seven years, to actively work against the Indian national interest.
Perhaps the most overlooked, under-analysed and alarming phenomenon of the last decade is the swift and thorough transformation of the Congress party as both a hub and a vehicle of the global Extreme Left.
Among other things, this transformation clearly explains the Congress party’s embrace of the divisive North Vs South narrative. Its roots are anchored in the spurious, colonial theoretical brew known as the Aryan Invasion Theory. Its earliest and also its most vocal proponent was EV Ramaswamy Naicker who was the first to demand a separate Tamil Nation.
In the early 1940s, this (Tamil) separatist call was embellished by the Communists who added another major ingredient to it : The so-called two-Nation theory. As the ardent champions of securing Pakistan for the Indian Muslim community, they published a toxic tract titled Pakistan and National Unity authored by Gangadhar Adhikari in 1942. This soon earned substantial notoriety as the Adhikari Thesis. It was an open call to balkanise India into multiple independent Nations along every conceivable fault line – caste, sub-caste, language, region, religion and even along something called an ‘expression for independence’.
A variant of this ‘thesis’ was revived in 2016 in a pamphletesque essay titled ‘United States of South India’. The essay is clothed in phoney academic language but is fundamentally an amalgam of the Aryan Invasion Theory, the Dravidian rhetoric of linguistic separatism, pseudo economics and even worse statistical jugglery. A good portion of its key themes are now being peddled as talking points on
TV debates and as political rhetoric by say, the DMK the Congress and the Ultra Left ecosystem.
The history and tactics of Communism – and the Left, broadly – are at play once more here. It first concocts a wishful theory and then builds on the theory and using circular logic and every possible logical fallacy, ‘proves’ the theory as a settled truth. The alleged ‘United States of South India’ is the latest offering of this theory-building boutique.
But reality tells us that this North Vs South narrative is just one more tactic to somehow unseat Narendra Modi. It is their ideological response in the face of serial and prolonged electoral losses that their ecosystem has suffered.
From another perspective, it is an admission of anxiety and a declaration of war. To state the blunt reality hiding in plain sight, large parts of South India have been de-Hinduised at an unprecedented pace and with greater success than the rest of India combined.
As I noted in my column on Udhayanidhi Stalin, anti-Hindu forces in South India have acquired committed political leadership especially in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. This leadership shows no qualms in pushing the de-Hinduisation agenda using the full might of the State apparatus.
And so, in one sense, the North Vs South narrative that has been revived in the aftermath of the Congress party’s three-State loss is fundamentally a Hindu versus anti-Hindu narrative. The rest is just glitzy makeup that attempts to conceal this agenda.
(Courtesy : dharmadispatch.in)
| Anti-Hindu forces in South India have acquired committed political leadership in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh ! |